Skip to main content

David Hicks: Tally of those in favor of justice and those not

Crikey [this piece only on subscription] carries this critically interesting "scorecard" on those who support bringing David Hicks home and those not:

"For the first time since his son David Hicks was first imprisoned, Terry Hicks is set to meet Attorney-General Philip Ruddock face to face this week. After almost five years, David Hicks remains imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay despite the fact that he is yet to go to trial.

Charges against Hicks of attempted murder, aiding the enemy and conspiracy were struck out in June when the US Supreme Court ruled the commission unlawful. Shadow Attorney-General Nicola Roxon has said that it’s a critical time for the Howard Government to act. "Charges have not yet been laid under the new military commission process and the US has made clear they would like to return as many people as they can to other countries."

A growing number of federal parliamentarians are concerned about the delays in the Hicks case and the government is looking increasingly isolated. Crikey has created a working list to see who, at a glance, wants Hicks home and who doesn't.

Bring Hicks home:

The Law Council of Australia: A new law passed by the US Congress will not provide a fair trial for David Hicks and guarantees another drawn-out appeal to the US Supreme Court, according to Tim Bugg, President of the Law Council of Australia.

All State Attorneys General: recently signed the Freemantle Declaration, which "affirms and upholds the basis of law which we rely" on. The declaration upholds the right for a fair trial, the prohibition of detention without trial, the prohibition of torture and the prohibition of the death penalty.

Opposition Leader Kim Beazley: Beazley said last week that it's time for Prime Minister John Howard to demand US President George W Bush bring terror suspect David Hicks to trial or send him home.

The Democrats: Last week a motion from Australian Democrats senator Natasha Stott Despoja, calling for Hicks to be brought back to Australia, was defeated 33-31. The Democrats' motion noted that Hicks was yet to be charged under the new act and that its provisions meant he would not have a fair trial.

Lawyers and former judges: A former federal solicitor general, Gavan Griffith QC, and former judge, Alistair Nicholson, are among a group of lawyers who said a replacement military commission didn’t meet with the Geneva conventions and the war crimes provision of Australian law. “It really is a joke in terms of the idea of a fair trial,” Mr Nicholson said.

Greens Senator Bob Brown: In August 2005, the Greens' Bob Brown proposed in the Senate: "That the Senate calls on the Government of the United States of America to immediately return Australian citizen Mr David Hicks to Australia." The motion was defeated fifty-three votes to eight, with Labor joining the Coalition to vote the proposal down. Fifteen senators, mostly Labor, did not vote.

Former PM Malcolm Fraser: "Why is it that the Australian Government continues to imply in effect, whatever its words, that David Hicks does not deserve basic justice?” Fraser wrote in The Age in October. “Australia should be most concerned at this total desertion and the total betrayal of the basic civil rights of David Hicks.”

Liberal MP Danna Vale: Liberal backbencher Danna Vale, declared her support for Hicks being brought home late last year... Vale told ABC Radio: "This fellow does not seem to be able to access any justice at all. I'm concerned he will die there [in Guantanamo Bay] …And if he does die there, what have I done, as an MP, to speak up for his case? He has already done four years, and four years in the most inhumane conditions."

Bono, lead singer of U2: U2 used the opening concert of their Australian tour to campaign for the terrorist suspect David Hicks to be released from Guantanamo Bay.

Leave him in Guantanamo:

Prime Minister John Howard: The PM told Southern Cross Broadcasting last week, "I am not happy about the time that is being taken but people should understand that if he is brought back to Australia he can't be tried for these offences because they were not offences under Australian law at the time they are alleged to have taken place.”

Health Minister Tony Abbott: Mr Abbott responded to last week’s Senate motion by urging his Government colleagues to remember Mr Hicks was captured with Taliban forces in Afghanistan five years ago. "I accept that he's been there for a long time, but I think that we've got to remember that this bloke was plainly up to no good and for that reason I think people are entitled to be concerned about just simply letting him go," Mr Abbott has said.

Attorney-General Philip Ruddock: Ruddock boycotted last week’s meeting between the state Attorneys General and Major Michael Mori, explaining that his attendance would be “inappropriate”. Mr Ruddock declined an invitation to attend as the issue was no business of his state counterparts, his spokesman said."The fact is ... the whole matter of David Hicks is a matter between the Commonwealth and the United States," he said.

On the fence (calling for a fair trial but not demanding that Hicks be brought home):

Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce: Backing away from his earlier comments that Hicks should be brought home, "...I do believe it's time he comes back to Australia," Joyce then put forward a motion calling on the US to bring Hicks to trial quickly. The motion said Hicks was yet to be charged under the US Military Commission Act. Senator Joyce said he was concerned that Hicks was being denied natural justice, but he fell short of demanding that Hicks be brought home. The Senate passed the motion and called on the government to continue pressing the United States to deal with Australian Guantanamo Bay prisoner David Hicks "expeditiously and fairly".

Church leaders: Australia's two most senior church leaders condemned the treatment of David Hicks in October and called on the Federal Government to ensure he is given a fair trial as quickly as possible. Anglican Archbishop of Sydney Peter Jensen said Hicks' detention at Guantanamo Bay for 4½ years without trial was an abuse of human rights. Catholic Archbishop of Sydney George Pell said: "I have long been disturbed by some aspects of David Hicks' situation. From all accounts we owe him no special favours at all, but he has a right to be brought to trial more quickly than has happened and now as quickly as possible."

The public: More than 90% of Australians believe Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks deserves a fair trial without delay, according to an October Newspoll surveycommissioned by the group GetUp. And they believe he won't get that fair trial in the US-run detention centre in Cuba, the survey revealed. The findings showed more than nine out of 10 (91%) of Australians believe Hicks, who has been in detention at Guantanamo Bay for almost five years without trial, should receive a fair trial."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig