Skip to main content

Gerard Henderson: "Poisonous little toad"

Gerard Henderson postures as some sort of arbiter of ethics - based on what is difficult to fathom other than his own self-appointed importance - on all manner of things but yesterday on Crikey sank to the level of writing one expects from either Piers Akerman or Andrew Bolt. The latter 2 are probably the most disreputable people [certainly not journalists] anywhere given any space to vent their spleen .

Mike Carleton writing in Crikey [this part free on line] today sums it all up neatly:

"Gerard Henderson can be a poisonous little toad when he puts his mind to it. To drag my wife into the Jonestown brawl, as he did in Crikey yesterday, is the sort of nasty irrelevance we have come to expect from him. "Mrs Carlton", he called her, with old-fashioned sexist condescension. It will no doubt come as a surprise to him and Mrs Henderson, but a lot of married women don’t automatically take the husband’s surname these days. Fancy that.

He and the rest of Alan Jones’s frothing crew of admirers resolutely ignore the central theme of the Masters book. It is not Jones’s homos-xuality that’s the problem; it’s his dishonesty as a broadcaster and its baleful effect on, among other things, the body politic.

But the right wing rabble – Henderson himself, Devine, Flint, Pearson, Akerman, and Bolt, the Melbourne village idiot – won’t touch that with a barge pole. Jones is to be defended at all costs, so they hide behind the smokescreen of attacking his critics as homophobes.

David Marr a gay-basher? Oh, please. This is a breathtaking piece of hypocrisy from people who, over the years, have revelled in putting the boot into the Sydney Gay Mardi Gras, Justice Michael Kirby, gay marriage, gay rights at law and so on.

Henderson’s endless posturing as the high arbiter of ethics in the media is tedious and disingenuous. The chair of the board of his family business, the Sydney Institute, happens to be Ms Meredith Hellicar, who is also chair of James Hardie. Is Gerard taking money from the asbestos killers? I think we should be told."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as