Skip to main content

Ostriches....and dopes!

The debate about the Iraq War continues to rage, but Mike Carleton in his weekly column in the SMH pointedly reminds us about the ostriches - and dopes, many of whom inhabit the Murdoch press - who saw and still see all good in the Iraq fiasco and tragedy:

"On the subject of ostrich heads stuck firmly in the sand, will the self-styled culture warriors of our right-wing punditocracy ever acknowledge how disastrously wrong they were about the Iraq war?

It's all on the record. "As we approach war with Iraq, it's becoming obvious that George W. Bush is really a modern Winston Churchill," gushed Greg Sheridan, foreign editor of The Australian, back in January 2003.

By April that year, just weeks after the American and coalition invasion, he and his fellow armchair strategists had the war done and won.

"All of the media analysts and many of the military analysts should hang their heads in shame," Sheridan wrote in the Oz. "Everything they told us was wrong. [Donald] Rumsfeld's historic project - transforming the US military into a lighter, faster, more precise and much more mobile beast - has had a huge boost."

Melbourne's village idiot, Andrew Bolt, a Herald Sun columnist, was also in triumphalist mode, almost capering in the streets. "No victory has been more complete and few can have promised so much good," he trumpeted to his readers.

On April 13, 2003, Gerard Henderson announced it was "time to junk the Vietnam association. In recent months, quite a few critics of George W. Bush's policy in the Gulf have warned that the United States could get bogged down in a Middle East quagmire similar to that which the US faced during the Vietnam War … Such an analysis demonstrates a misunderstanding of both the US commitment in Vietnam and contemporary America."

As late as February 2005, The Daily Telegraph's pompous bloviator-in-chief, Piers Akerman, was still hard at it: "Recollect our own quagmirists, those in the media who saw parallels with Vietnam?" he blathered. "Those puling broadcasters who all but wished defeat upon those who took the fight to Saddam when the UN Security Council dingoed its own resolutions? The determined turnout in Iraq is a vindication of the true global visionaries."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as