Skip to main content

Be troubled

Two news reports out today clearly show how the now defeated Howard Government - and certain Ministers in particular, such as Downer, Ruddock, Andrews and the PM himself - stand sorely condemned for their conduct in a variety of ways in relation to Mamdouh Habib and Dr Haneef.

Thanks to a judge hearing a defamation case in NSW releasing a hitherto secret report on Mr Habib we are now better informed about the Howard Government's duplicity and unconscionable conduct:

"Senior members of the Howard government, including the former prime minister and the foreign minister, were given a detailed briefing on Mamdouh Habib's allegations of torture in Egypt as early as mid-2002.

But they never told the Australian public of the serious allegations, did little to investigate them — and three years later were still protesting they had no knowledge Mr Habib had even been in Egypt.

NSW Supreme Court judge Justice Peter McClelland — who is hearing a defamation case brought by Mr Habib against Nationwide News over an article written by columnist Piers Ackerman — yesterday released a welfare report sent to prime minister John Howard, foreign minister Alexander Downer and others in late May 2002, just after the first visit by Australian officials to see Mr Habib and David Hicks at Guantanamo Bay.

"(Mr Habib) said he was tortured," the report, marked "secret", said. "Water was dripped on his head and he was administered electric shocks over his body. Mr Habib said he was trussed upside down and his body beaten. He said he sustained broken ribs, two broken toes and bleeding from his penis."

The report — entitled Australian Government Visit to Guantanamo Bay: Welfare Aspects — goes on to describe how Mr Habib said his "captors made him listen to noises that resembled his family and the sound of his wife being raped and children being beaten. He said he was placed neck-high in water for extended periods of time and not allowed to sleep."

Read the full piece in The Age here. Meanwhile, the dangers of vesting Government agencies with authority to act secretly is no where more clearly shown than in this piece, also in The Age:

"Brisbane lawyer Peter Russo had no idea of the sweep and power of Australia's terrorism laws until he answered a call from the sergeant in charge of the watchhouse at Brisbane's police station in July.

As a criminal lawyer, he was considered by the police to be obliging and often helped deal with drunks.

On this occasion he walked through the reinforced steel door and was astounded to find himself defending a client against evidence considered so secret that he could not see it.

At the National Press Club yesterday, Mr Russo recounted what it is like to be a lawyer at the business end of the laws introduced after the September 11 terrorism attacks, as he tried to find out what Gold Coast doctor Mohamed Haneef had allegedly done and battled to free him from custody.

The sergeant introduced him to two detectives. One gestured towards the television news showing a vehicle burning at Glasgow Airport and told him that was why he was there.

The other handed him two sheets of paper from the Crimes Act that he had printed from the internet.

"He tried to explain to me how that section of the Crimes Act works. It was about that time I started to get a bit concerned about how this was unfolding."

He was then introduced to Dr Haneef, who told him he was a doctor at the Gold Coast Hospital with a wife and new baby.

Normally police tell a suspect what they had allegedly done and what the evidence against them was, Mr Russo said.

He soon discovered the situation was very different in a terrorism case."

It is note and praiseworthy that the incoming Attorney-General today announced an expansion of the inquiry into the Haneef case, as the SMH reports:

"The investigation into the deportation of Indian doctor Mohamed Haneef may be expanded, incoming attorney-general Robert McClelland says.

Mr McClelland said he would wait for reports from the Australian Federal Police (AFP), the ASIO security service and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) before deciding if further scrutiny was necessary.

The AFP and DPP have blamed each other for the collapse of the case but Mr McClelland said there were broader issues to be examined.

"The Haneef case in some ways is an example of a breakdown in effective functioning," he told The Weekend Australian.

"From afar, on any measure it looked untidy."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig