Skip to main content

Olympics: Welcome to the "no-fun Games"

John Taylor was the Australian ABC's China correspondent from 2002 to 2006. He returned to Beijing for the Olympics - and reports on the Radio National's Correspondent's Report:

"Welcome to the no-fun Games, the dirty Games, the repressive Olympics, the One Party party. You could go on and on like that.

China has invested billions of dollars in this international set piece to show the world it's back, and to be reckoned with. But it's not going as the Communist officials planned.

The weather has been all over the place. The pro-Tibetan protests have kept on coming. The venues aren't full. And the joy that was so evident on the streets of Sydney eight years ago just isn't here.

It's not that they haven't tried. I reckon the authorities have tried as hard as they can to make sure Beijing looks and is as good as it can. But I don't think the officials get it because of who and what they are: unelected, and unaccountable, except to each other.

They can't be honest, because they believe the public is to be feared, not embraced. Power is vested in the few, not the many. Friends and family come before the public. It creates distrust, anger, and danger.

But these truths can't be acknowledged, and must be hidden. China is striving to be a harmonious society, officials say. It is peaceful and non-threatening to the world.

But when does putting on your best face cross over to be just faking it? Is it faking it to have a little girl mime to another child's singing, because the Opening Ceremony needs a very pretty child? What about inserting computer graphics of fireworks into the live televised Opening Ceremony?

It wasn't faking it to the authorities that organised the Opening Ceremony. It didn't matter that it wasn't real: it looked better, and it fooled people, so great!

On the day the Olympics began, there was a carnival atmosphere outside the main Olympic precinct. Thousands of people spontaneously flocked to the area. The fences were strong and kept them out, but they actually didn't want to go in: they wanted to share their Olympic anticipation."

Interestingly, Mike Carlton, writing his weekly column in the SMH, comes to a not dissimilar conclusion:

"Somehow, the Olympic Games are not doing it for me this time around."

And:

"But there is something just not happening. And after some deep thought - at least a minute of it - I have worked out what it is. These games lack a heart and soul. There is no warmth to them. You never get the feeling that anything spontaneous might ever be allowed to get in the way of the relentless, goose-stepping march of organisational perfection.

Where are all the people? At Sydney 2000, and in Athens four years ago, the streets and the parks and the bars were thronged. There was a carnival mood. In Beijing, to judge from the television pictures, you could machine-gun some of the public spaces and not hit anyone. Perhaps they already have. The place has no life to it."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as