Skip to main content

Call for humanity

From Wired Blog Network:

"Despite the pinpoint targeting, despite the satellite-guided, pint-sized bombs, despite the lawyers in the air operations center and the patient behavioral profiling, American airstrikes in Afghanistan still continue to kill civilians at an alarming rate; more than three dozen were allegedly slain yesterday in a strike on a wedding party in Kandahar province. Every errant attack undermines U.S. efforts to stabilize the country, and gives the Taliban another propaganda win. But the air war is showing no signs of slowing down -- in fact, airstrikes are up more than 30 percent this year.

So what can U.S. commanders do about the civilian death toll? A well-connected outsider has an out-of-the-box idea for the new administration. "One thing President Obama can do immediately: Create by executive order a high-level position at the Pentagon dedicated to the human costs of war," Sarah Holewinski, executive director of the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict, tells DANGER ROOM.

'The Pentagon is a sprawling bureaucracy, but with all that manpower, there is no one place, no one person specifically paying attention to civilian casualties. Leadership from the top on this very contentious issue is absolutely necessary, lest U.S. forces continue to make more enemies than friends. The Pentagon position would assess the potential human cost of war before any shots are fired, make sure proven techniques to avoid civilians are in place and constantly improved, maintain proper investigative and statistical data on civilian harm in combat zones, and ensure prompt compensation to any civilians unintentionally harmed by U.S. combat operations.'

That may sound like a far-out idea from deep within Dennis Kucinich-land. But CIVIC is seriously plugged into the military. It contributed to the Army's handbook on escalation of force procedures, and has a network of friends in uniform. And before her death in 2005, CIVIC founder Marla Ruzicka successfully lobbied for U.S. government assistance to Afghan and Iraqi families harmed during military operations.

But in a war where enemies pop up at a moment's notice, and fade into the background almost as quick, can the military afford to have another layer of bureacracy, like the one CIVIC is proposing? Can it afford not to?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as