Skip to main content

The legal minefield awaiting Team Obama

A lot has already been written how Obama on assuming office will be challenged to "undo" many much of the disgraceful conduct and actions of George W and his cohorts. It's a long list.....

Richard Ackland, lawyer, commentator and writer, in his weekly op-ed piece in the Sydney Morning Herald considers how Bush "dealt" with the law - or rather, ignored it so flagrantly:

"It's "just a piece of paper" is the way George Bush famously described the US constitution. Bush has scant respect for the piece of paper and surrounded himself with lawyers who systematically worked out ways to shred it.

Barack Obama, by contrast, was a senior lecturer in constitutional law at the University of Chicago and knows the crevices and crannies of the piece of paper like few other presidents before him.

Among the myriad awful circumstances that Obama inherits, the Bush legal legacy ranks as one of the most wretched. The Administration's view has been that if national security demands it, the president, as commander in chief, can do pretty much what he likes.

Statutes that prohibit secret detention in black-hole prisons, surveillance of the American people without warrant and torture have all been ignored or redefined out of existence.

The protections afforded by habeas corpus and the Geneva Conventions have been taken out the back and shot.

Like Louis XIV before him, Bush says, "L'Etat, c'est moi" (I am the state).

He could declare anyone, anywhere, to be an illegal enemy combatant, even though they had committed no war crime or fought in any war. Outside the normal laws of war, or even the criminal law, they could be sent to a black-hole prison, where they could be tortured, and face trial on charges based on "coerced testimony" and hearsay.

The accused could not even testify they had been tortured because to say so would violate a classified secret."

Read on here......

Comments

Anonymous said…
this is the subject which i will be watching most closely.

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as