When writing saves lives

Amnesty International has an enviable reputation. It's letter writing to prisoners of conscience and publicly agitating for human rights is well know. But what difference does a written letter actually make?

Mahendra Kusuma Wardhana - a former prisoner of conscience - has a personal experience of how much difference Amnesty letter writing campaigns can make.

Wardhana writes in "Writing saves lives" on the New Statesman of his experience:

"This week marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) – the document that led to the foundation of Amnesty International. To mark the anniversary, Amnesty is calling on everyone to send a greetings card to show solidarity and support to a prisoner of conscience or a human rights activist or organisation.

But how much can writing one card make a difference? How much can such a tiny gesture really change things? The answer is far greater than you can ever imagine.

I should know. I was a prisoner of conscience in my native Indonesia and received more than 4,000 cards of support during my time in custody.

That simple act of solidarity had a real impact for me.

My crime had been to take part in an anti-government demonstration to complain about their decision to dramatically raise fuel prices. As part of the protest, photographs of the president and vice-president were burnt. I was jailed for three years for this “offence” and was tortured.

Shortly afterwards, Amnesty International labelled me a Prisoner of Conscience and featured me in their Greetings Card Campaign.

Once the cards started to arrive, the prison guards were more careful in dealing with me. It also helped me to know that I had lots of support. I was convinced that what I did was not criminal and it was important to me to know that other people believed that too."

Comments

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary. The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives? In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Mahler's Prodigal Son

Search This Blog