Skip to main content

Did anyone ask Afghan women?

President Obama has drawn some praise for his suggestion that the US might be prepared to talk to the moderate Taliban in war-torn Afghanistan. It might be a good idea although it has to be said that the country is almost certainly a narco-State and a failed one at that. No less importantly, Patricia Lalonde [the chairwoman of Mobilization for Elected Women in Afghanistan (MEWA)] in a piece "Did anyone ask Afghan women?" in the IHT asks whether the women in Afghanistan would be prepared to have any Taliban-influence in their country.

"I have just returned from Afghanistan and I am struck by the news: There’s talk about negotiations with the moderate Taliban. President Barack Obama announced it this week, and the message has been relayed by European leaders.

Let us first be clear: Either we’re talking about those Taliban whose moderation means 10 lashes instead of 100 for women who show their ankles, and maybe we can negotiate them down to five, or we’re talking about rebels who are victims of current misery in their country and find themselves loosely affiliated with the Taliban. If the latter is the case, let’s not call them Taliban.

The Afghan women I know cannot conceive of a ‘‘moderate’’ Taliban, not to mention negotiations with them. The Taliban are the Taliban, Islamists who advocate a fundamentalist and extremist ideology in which the role of the woman is to be muzzled and illiterate.

Many of these women already fought a battle against that role when the Taliban were in power. They won that battle.

Democracy is working for them. Girls go to school. Women comprise 25 percent of the Afghan Parliament and they are doing a remarkable job. They are learning “politics’’: a recent budget vote on funds earmarked for women in various ministries met with opposition from the male deputies, whereby the women rose and left the chamber. The women got the budget they wanted."

Read the complete piece here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as