Skip to main content

Horrific 'Guardian' reports will stoke international pressure for Gaza war crimes investigation

From Mondoweiss:

"The Guardian has published three videos with statements from Palestinians supporting allegations of Israeli war crimes in the Gaza assault. The Guardian says Israeli soldiers used Palestinian children as human shields for tanks, targeted medics and ambulances, and used drones to fire missiles, sometimes killing whole families. Ilene Cohen writes:

I think we can by now safely move beyond the word "allegation." Among the conclusions:
In a report released today, doctors for Human Rights Israel said there was "certainty" that Israel violated international humanitarian law during the three-week war in January, with attacks on medics, damage to medical buildings, indiscriminate attacks on civilians and delays in medical treatment for the injured.

"We have noticed a stark decline in IDF [Israeli Defence Forces] morals concerning the Palestinian population of Gaza, which in reality amounts to a contempt for Palestinian lives," said Dani Filc, chairman of Physicians for Human Rights Israel.

The first crime, of course, was initiating this war. And its accomplishments? It brought incalculable harm to the people of Gaza and their world; it did nothing for Israel's security; and it yielded probably six or seven additional Knesset seats for Tzipi Livni.

From there, the rest is the fallout of war, wanton killing and destruction in one tiny, densely populated piece of our world. But somehow the Israelis always seem to do their wars and operations with an especial--frightening--zeal. It is not to be expected that Israel, an old hand at committing war crimes and evading accountability, will do anything about this. How could it when clearly nothing here was an "accident"? I was not pleased to see a crawling head on the home page of Haaretz stating that the US has labeled the UN rapporteur for the Occupied Territories (Richard Falk) "biased," echoing the Israeli response to Professor Falk, as well as to all others who dare to call war crimes by their proper name. Perhaps this is not so; unfortunately, however, it may be exactly so.

But even the United States, I think, will not be able to cover for Israel this time (nor should it want to). This is not going away: the evidence is mounting and coming from too many quarters. In the end, we will not need Israel to complete the investigation--or even to start it. And it may be that it has taken the atrocity of Gaza 2008-9 to finally bring an end to this pattern Israeli warmongering against the Palestinian people. That is--if the response from around the world is sharp and unequivocal. I hope that is not wishful thinking

The report from The Guardian includes three videos. I hope you will watch them all. Each also provides the "official" IDF response. Expect the Israelis to mount vicious attacks against those making the allegations. We owe it to the victims, whom we have ignored for far too long, to pay attention this time."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as