Skip to main content

Hearing absent voices in the Middle East discourse

Perhaps most in the West ought to sit up and take notice of the words of leaders in the Middle East all too sadly missing in the discourse and narrative of that troubled region.

FP's Middle East Channel report makes for worthwhile reading:

"This week, Charlie Rose was in Damascus and conducted high-profile interviews with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal. The Bashar interview echoed many of the points previously made on the Channel by Joshua Landis in his piece 'What is behind the Scud scare?' in which he described how Bashar's Syria views its strategic decisions largely in a context of an assymetric power imbalance with Israel. Bashar noted about the U.S. in this vein that:

They don't understand that we want peace. But if you want peace, it doesn't mean--to sign [sic] peace treaty, it doesn't mean we sign capitulation agreement. That's what they don't understand. There is a big different between capitulation agreement and peace treaty.

Meanwhile, Rose's interview with Meshaal, both explicitly and implicitly, shed light on how the Islamic Resistance movement sees itself and how it reconciles the fact of its movement and political apparatuses. On the latter point, Meshaal expanded upon previous statements that have reflected the pragmatic wing of Hamas' political ideology. Said Meshaal: "So when the occupation comes to an end, the resistance will end, as simple as that. If Israel would go to the 1967 borders...that will be the end of the Palestinian resistance." He went on to declare Hamas' opposition to the intentional targeting of civilians, called on the United States to directly negotiate with the movement, and that Hamas didn't have any "problem whatsoever with the United States", just with its favoritism in the region."

Go here and here to view the two interviews.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig