Skip to main content

Poor Rupe!

It may too early to call the outcome of the British election [next Thursday] and the Sun King, Rupert Murdoch, may still see the Conservatives, who he backs, back into power, but this piece "Murdoch's election blues" from Business Spectator shows the way the man "behaves".

"If you thought Gordon Brown was having a bad election, spare some sympathy for Rupert Murdoch. After, you know, practically winning the election for John Major and the Conservatives back in 1992, and then giving Labour and Blair a massive leg-up in 1997, he's having a dog of a 2010 in terms of the wielding of political influence.

It seems Rupert was convinced by son James, who was convinced by former Sun editor and Murdoch clan confidant Rebekah Brooks (nee Wade), that his UK newspapers should support David Cameron, Britain's Conservative party candidate for prime minister.

"This took some doing," says Murdoch biographer Michael Wolff on Newser, "because Murdoch had become a good friend and pretty loyal supporter of Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

But since the The Sun came out for the Tories the party has seen its poll rating drop from 41 per cent to 33 per cent, prompting the Financial Times to begin charting Cameron’s downward movement under the inevitable headline “It’s The Sun Wot Lost it”.

And when Lib-Dem candidate Nick Clegg emerged as the underdog alternative to Labour last week, the Murdoch papers embarked upon what Wolff described as "a full-scale attack on Clegg with hardly any pretence other than to help Cameron".

And then, last week, The Independent ran a front page with the headline “Rupert Murdoch will not decide the outcome of the election. You will.”

Such effrontery triggered what Wolff has described as "a coming-apart-at-the-seams scenario", in which Wade/Brooks and James Murdoch "stormed over to The Independent, breached its security systems, barged into the offices of the (paper's) editor-in-chief and top executive, Simon Kelner, and commenced, in Brit-speak, a giant row."

Their goal, says Wolff, was to put forward "that newspaper publishers don’t slag off other newspaper publishers in polite Britain," least of all the Murdochs. But they then went and undermined their argument, adds Wolff in a later Newser post, by "threatening to investigate Evgeny Lebedev, the son of The Independent’s new owner, Russian businessman, Alexander Lebedev (also the owner of the Evening Standard)."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as