Skip to main content

The Sum shines, brightly indeed, on The Sun King and his family

Is any comment called for - other than to gasp!- when one reads this from Crikey, an Australian on-line daily publication?:

"The latest trip on the News Corporation gravy train trip -- for chairman Rupert Murdoch, son James and two other senior executives -- has left the station and could, over the next three years, shower hundreds of millions of dollars in cash and shares on the four men involved.

Besides Rupert and James Murdoch, the other members of this exclusive train ride are CEO Chase Carey and finance boss David DeVoe.

The new arrangements could see all four men receiving a minimum of $US60 million in cash and shares and a maximum of $US123 million in cash and shares a year over the next three years, starting with the current 2011 financial year.

For the four, there are cash bonuses of a minimum of $37.5 million for the current financial year, and a maximum of $100.5 million. This is before base salaries paid to the four men (US4.05 million in the case of Carey this year and $US8.1 million in 2009 for Rupert Murdoch).

In addition, the four men could receive a further $US22.5 million of News Corp shares (in varying proportions), for the current financial year. The bonuses and the performance share awards for 2012 and 2013 were not given in the filing with the US securities and Exchange Commission filing overnight. They will be announced at later dates in each of the years, judging from the filing.

The filing said "The new compensation framework is intended to increase the total portion of each eligible officer’s compensation that is performance-based and that is tied to the company’s equity and will be made in lieu of the company’s EPS-based annual bonus and discretionary long-term equity awards granted previously and described in the company’s proxy statement filed on August 20, 2009."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as