Skip to main content

Now that it's on....how will the No-Fly Zone work over Libya?

So now that the UN has sanctioned a No-fly Zone over Libya, how is it going to work?

"Experts have outlined how they think coalition forces will establish the No Fly Zone over Libya.
Action to stop Libyan forces bombing rebels could start with a cruise missile strike to neutralise air defences, close-up bombing of runways and then patrols to enforce a no-fly zone, experts say.

UN Security Council Resolution 1973 authorises the use of all means necessary to protect civilians, including air strikes, and the creation of a no-fly zone to prevent Moamer Kadhafi attacking rebels.

The French-British led military priority is to neutralise air power and especially air defences.

"There are probably around 15 targets already identified for air strikes," defence specialist Richard Labeviere said: firstly runways, then planes and helicopters, command centres, radar installations and anti-aircraft batteries.

While Kadhafi has around 400 warplanes, mainly Russian Migs, only 20 to 30 are thought to be operational, several sources said. Nevertheless, Libya is thought to have significant ground-based air defences.

"What's feasible, easily and quickly, in a few hours, without too much vulnerability, are air strikes with very precise cruise missiles, fired from a safe distance by Rafale or Mirage 2000 D fighters," a military expert said.

The graduated option would then allow for the use of anti-runway Apache missiles, with a range of around 150 kilometres, and/or Scalp anti-infrastructure missiles, with a range of 400 to 500 kilometres.

Moving in closer, laser- or GPS-guided bombs and missiles could be used, between 15 and 50 kilometres away.

Their use would involve the deployment of the full spectrum of air power, including fighter jets, AWACS surveillance planes, C-135 refuelling planes and reconnaissance flights.

"In that case, we're more in a situation of permanent presence and attacks on opposing forces, you can target tank columns. It's feasible but requires going deeper into enemy territory with the risk of having to confront ground-to-air defences," the expert said, asking not to be named.

"If you want to set yourself up for creating a no-fly zone, you need air defence fighters with air-to-air missiles - Mirage 2000, Rafale, Eurofighter (Typhoon) or Tornado - that would be constantly present with the AWACS and refuelling planes."

"Given the weakness of Libya's fighters, which don't fly at night, and the strength of our planes, you need from sunrise to sunset to have a constant patrol of four planes in the area," or around 20-30 planes in succession."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as