Skip to main content

Anyone who has travelled "cattle class" on an airline will empathise

Anyone who has been subjected to "cattle class" on an airline - especially in the USA - will empathise with the sentiments of this correspondent on Salon in "The injustice of economy class".

"So here I am in Row 46, mulling the injustices of economy class. Allow me to ask a few pointed questions of those who design aircraft seats.

First, would it really be too much trouble to engineer a tray table that is not eager to destroy your laptop computer when the person in front of you reclines? Millions of travelers know what I'm talking about: a pinch point forms as the seat back moves aft, wedging your computer screen between the horizontal tray and the cushion above. If the person reclines fast enough -- "assault recliners" is my name for folks who come hauling back all at once, without consideration for the poor soul behind them -- you've got nary a split-second to rescue your machine from this deadly nutcracker.

It's even more dangerous if your plane has seat-back entertainment screens. The lower edge of the video console juts out an extra half-inch or so from the vertical, reaching even further into your space. On the road I carry an 11-inch MacBook Air, a pretty small computer. Yet to keep the screen clear I need to tip it forward to the point where it becomes hard to see.

Considering the number of people who travel with laptops, and what a great time-killer onboard computing is, you'd think somebody would have addressed this. I know that a seat-back video screen cannot be made paper thin, but its shape or placement could easily be better. An adjustment to the shape and placement of the tray would also help.

As would an inch or two of extra legroom. This is wishful thinking, I know, at least on U.S. carriers, but many foreign airlines offer a touch more space at the knees and thus also are more laptop-friendly."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as