Skip to main content

Peace (if it ever had any chance) dead in the water

It is hard to know what was worse. The Israeli PM's speech to the US Congress - or those who listened to his talk and gave him 31 standing ovations. Netanyahu killed off any chance of peace with the Palestinians any time soon and the response of the US legislators ensured that the Arab world will see the Americans as anything but honest brokers.

Haaretz has this piece well worth reading in the circumstances.

"The tension didn't kill us before the speech and we managed to survive it, too. We'll live to see how Israel manages to manage despite its prime minister. Yesterday's speech to Congress was a surrealistic performance in Orwellian style. He's the representative of a county that for 44 years has denied its Palestinian neighbors' freedom, an occupier boasting as if he was a liberator, speaking about freedom and reaping the rewards.

That same man, who wouldn't agree to another short settlement construction freeze, is promising to be "generous." Is the right-wing, anti-Obama applause evidence that members of Congress live on the moon? We, on the other hand, live here, and even sometimes die before our time. And as the prophet of Israeli insubordination once said, peace will not come of this, nor will any sort of agreement.

Yesterday Netanyahu revealed whether he wanted to be Menachem Begin or Yitzhak Shamir, and Shamir it was. The link between undivided Jewish Jerusalem and an Israeli army presence in the Jordan Valley and settlement blocs are the shoal on which declarations are dashed. If this had been the speech of his lifetime, that's one thing. Nothing really would have happened. But it was the speech of our lifetimes and it is our disaster. In the absence of a peace process, a process of belligerence develops that ultimately explodes. And there was nothing in the speech to constitute even a drop of fuel to jump-start the diplomatic process.

It's already time to open the emergency warehouses, and Education Minister Gideon Sa'ar can expand his proposed school program through which our children would adopt the graves of the fallen. If it is truly impossible to defend Israel in the 1967 borders with agreed-upon swaps, this country is a lost cause.

Yesterday Netanyahu followed the advice of his advisers, who advised him to "walk between the raindrops." The problem is that such a stroll is as feasible as walking on water, which even then was considered a miracle. Maybe the prime minister won't get too wet, but Israel is liable to get swept away in the floodwaters.

There are times when leaders must place themselves in the eye of the storm or into the flames, and either get wet to the bone or burned. Netanyahu's speech did not project such readiness. Those same advisers from the government and the media implored him to say "yes, but," meaning "yes, but no," as if it is only they who hear the "no" and the whole world was deaf.

Is Obama's despair with Netanyahu as great as our own, and it's just that the president's experiencing it on his journey to Dublin and London is more comfortable? And what happened to those 30 words of redemption that were supposed to grip and amaze the world? It's not that expected surprise that gave Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad his heart attack.

About all we have left is prayer, to he who makes peace in the heavens, because he who makes peace on earth won't do a thing."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig