Skip to main content

Don't think you are really secure

Pause for thought that after all those billions spent on security at airports in the US, a Report just out doesn't give one any confidence that all the hoop-la surrounding what has been introduced is really effective - let alone been worth the money spent.

"A vast government bureaucracy and hundreds of billions of dollars a decade after the 9-11 attacks did not prevent a dubious grade for American safety from terrorists, according to a new security report.

The report released Wednesday morning in Washington D.C. comes from the 9/11 Commission, which is devoted to protecting Americans from terrorist attacks.

The assessment does show some improvements over a report card issued just after the 9/11 Commission’s recommendations. That report card, also compiled by former members of the 9/11 Commission, assigned the government a series of failing letter grades — five F’s, 12 D’s and two “incompletes.”

“A decade after 9-11, the nation is not yet prepared for a truly catastrophic disaster,” said the new report called “Tenth Anniversary Report Card: The Status of 9-11 Commission Recommendations.”

The new report was chaired by former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean and former Rep. Lee Hamilton of Indiana.

The newest “Report Card” did not issue grades. But it covered the 41 recommendations made in 2004 by the 9/11 commission. Of the 41, nine have been inadequately implemented or not implemented at all, said the authors. The report also found various inadequacies:

Police and fire used different frequencies during 9-11. According to the commission, that problem still exists. It blames congress for not allocating new broadcast frequencies for common use by all so-called “first responders.”

The TSA still does not have the capacity to detect concealed weapons.

America’s ability to detect explosives hidden on passengers boarding airplanes “lacks reliability.”

The report said Homeland Security’s new full-body scanners are not effective (as officials claimed) at detecting hidden explosives.

The type of state legislation to prevent hijackers who in the past got state-issued ID’s to board airlines has been repeatedly delayed. Compliance has been pushed back over and over until the date is now 2013.

Prior recommendations that the government fingerprint visa holders as they leave the country that raised objections because of its high costs have also been ignored.

Some observers say many of the anti-terror recommendations have been pushed aside or delayed because of cost or because they ran afoul of privacy and civil liberty concerns.

“Until some of these things are done, we aren’t going to be as safe as we should be,” Kean said in an interview with the Tribune. He called it “outrageous” that the US Congress has not dealt legislatively with some of the problems.

The report cites some positive developments such as significant progress in improving homeland security, notably in the case of intelligence sharing and in the overall screening of airline passengers.

The new report is far from alone in the latest governmental findings stemming from the 9-11 attacks.

There’s an investigation into charities established to serve families of the victims. There’s also a series of intelligence hearings on Capitol Hill. Finally, there’s a national report on the various state’s plans to protect children in the event of another similar disaster."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as