Skip to main content

How women rate & rank in the world

In a piece commemorating International Women's Day, an op-ed piece in Toronto's the star.com puts into context how women rank in the world.   It's not such a happy or positive picture....

"On the 101st International Women’s Day, let’s skip across borders. Where are the best, safest places on the planet to be female? Where are the most frightening, miserable and hopeless?

If you judge by what Afghan President Hamid Karzai said Tuesday, Afghanistan is proudly near the top in wretchedness. “Men are fundamental and women are secondary,” the Ulema Council of 150 top Muslim clerics officially declared in its code of conduct and Karzai posted it on his website. I’m surprised he didn’t Tweet it. I’m surprised it’s news.

Nevertheless, Afghanistan is not the worst place to be a woman, according to political, educational, jobs and health indicators, the Independent concluded recently in a statistical study. Yemen is. Afghanistan is merely the most dangerous. One wonders why we went to war there. Did we really improve women’s lives? Was this ever our aim?

Going solely by political representation, Rwanda does best with 56.3 per cent of its 80-seat lower house being female. But it’s not a balanced contest worldwide, with http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/mar/07/women-representation-in-politics-worldwide?INTCMP=SRCHDatablog research from the Interparliamentary Union and UN Women revealing that seven countries have no female representation whatsoever, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar, nations we like to consider allies.

Egypt has all of two women representatives, which suggests the so-called Arab Spring is still wintry for women.

Canada does badly, 40th in the world for women political representatives — one place below little Luxembourg — with 76 of 308 Canadian House of Commons seats going to women. But it’s better than Britain at #54, tied with Malawi. And it is much better than the U.S. which stands at #78, tied with Turkmenistan, and far below many nations it professes to despise.

“Less than one in five parliamentarians in the world today are women,” concludes IPU head Anders P. Johnsson. “It is a worrying statistic at this point of human development and impossible to justify. The political will to change this is simply lacking in most cases.” This is a fact. It hurts.

Norway is the best place to become a mother, with maternal mortality at one in 7,600. Afghanistan is the worst, with the Independent reporting that a woman is at least 200 times more likely to die during childbirth than from warfare.

Sweden comes first in abortion rights, with abortions available without restriction for the first 18 weeks. El Salvador, the Philippines and Nicaragua all ban abortion, as would the U.S. if a Republican defeated President Barack Obama, and one hopes he won’t. Canada doesn’t do too badly, unless you live in P.E.I. where no abortions are permitted, or New Brunswick, a province that ignores the national Health Care Act and where poor women cannot get an abortion.

Women live longest in Japan, perhaps because life is comparatively restful without hope of great success. Only 8 per cent of upper management is female. Danish women only spend 57 more minutes a day on unpaid work than Danish men, but Mexican women spend a full four hours and 21 minutes more.

Qatar is a great place for women to attend university. They outnumber men six to one, perhaps to fill the empty hours, because there are few jobs for them when they leave. Saudi Arabia is the only nation to ban women from driving, not that they could afford a car. Saudi women earn an average $7,157 U.S. a year, compared with men’s $36,727.

It’s hard to draw specific lessons from these numbers but easy to draw wide conclusions. In most of the world, you drew the short straw when you were born female and the unfortunate consequences will range from being forced to live a tiny cramped life to suffering early death.

In Canada, I try to take heart from the fact that we live amid a work in progress. Women only became legal “persons” in 1929, Dr. Henry Morgentaler only won us abortion rights in 1988 and we are still swimming on the surface of a massive sea change in human relations. Women have never had many rights. Now we have some.

But I do not say that it can only get better. In Canada and the U.S., women’s rights are under attack every day. It can get much much worse.

That said, I wave a distant greeting to the “secondary” women of Afghanistan, where the council also declares wife-beating just fine as long as a man has a good sharia reason. Much disgust comes your way, councillors!

On March 8, 2013, we’ll check the numbers again, and rate the worldwide welfare of women’s bodies and souls."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig