Skip to main content

Afghanistan post the exit of "official" military

Paul McGeough, who has covered the Middle East extensively, and authoritatively, writing in "US exit creates army ripe for recruitment" for the Sydney Morning Herald, assesses the situation Afghanistan will find itself in post those "official" military - that is foreign Government military as distinct from the vast array of private contractors who are in Afghanistan now, and will continue to do so - leaving in the next 6 to 18 months.

"Numbers coming out of Afghanistan often are scary but try wrapping your head around this one - 123,500.

After a roller-coaster decade of training by the US-led coalition, that's the number of soldiers and policemen who will be turfed from Kabul's foreign-funded security payroll as the coalition goes through the pretence of a dignified exit from what has become the US's longest war.
As bottom-line budget tightening, these cuts will be welcome in coalition capitals. But they will be even more welcome as an army of well-trained, battle-hardened fighters for the insurgencies and militias that are busily carving out territory, even before the departure of coalition forces from Afghanistan.

Given Afghanistan's inevitable future as a cot case, I've always been troubled by two aspects of its occupation in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks on the US.

First, education. With last year's school enrolments peaking at just over 8 million in a country with the bleakest of economic prospects, there is a good chance that these children will get just enough education to make them appreciate the circumstances of their lives - how angry they will become and just how they channel that anger remains to be seen.

Second, security. In its determination to equip Afghanistan with a sophisticated military and police machine, the coalition is close to having stood up a combined force of 352,000. But the failure to establish a government whose writ extends much beyond the suburbs of Kabul leaves any such security force ripe for the recruitment as foot soldiers for gangsters, warlords and insurgency commanders as their ambitions collide when the foreign forces have packed up."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as