Skip to main content

Psst! Wanna use a drone?

What this op-ed piece on The Drum on ABC Australia's web site reveals about drones - and the cost of getting to use one - is, to say the least, more than troubling.

"Thus far, drone surveillance has largely been the preserve of the US military and the CIA, and closely associated with another military and security concern: killing.

If you live in Afghanistan, Pakistan or Yemen, you may feel that once-innocent skies are now watching you - Predator and Reaper drones, the arrogant weapons of a foreign empire, aloft at 25,000 feet.

That they are piloted from facilities inside the United States tells you that whatever they are doing in your skies - and whoever they are here to kill deliberately, accidentally or incidentally - it is not worth an American life.

Pakistani novelist Mohammed Hanif has warned of the psychological damage of "living in a place where these death machines hover 24/7" and of a generation which will grow up seeking revenge.

Search the net and you will find Yemeni youth tweeting drone sightings, Pakistani students propagandistically claiming to have built their own radars, and shocking phone footage of men's and women's bodies lying by burning cars, reported to be the aftermath of a strike.

This is the context against which drones are now coming to Western skies, ready for a wide variety of uses, from research to rescue, to things more sinister.

Here, fears are for privacy: the fact that, whether we will allow it or not, drones have the potential to be tools of constant and perpetual surveillance.

If that sounds alarmist, consider that a fully-equipped drone now costs as little as $2,000. Compared to manned aircraft, they are much cheaper to fly - some operating for as little as $3.36 an hour.

Their capabilities are also rapidly expanding. The Insitu Scan Eagle and its 'imaging payload', for example, can now circle a target for a full 24 hours. That seems quaint compared to Lockheed Martin's Stalker drone (inaudible above 400 feet) which can now stay aloft for days: recharged in flight, by laser."

 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig