Skip to main content

Yet again, Israel shows itself to be a renegade

Israel can almost be counted on to flout UN resolutions, ignore warnings of this or the other (usually infractions of Arab or Palestinian rights) breaching international law (think the expansion of settlements into the West Bank and making Gaza a virtual open prison as but 2 examples) or failing to work with other nations in the international sphere.

The Director-General of Amnesty International, writing in Haaretz brings to one's attention another failure on the part of Israel.  This time, it's attendance at an important UN forum.

"At the end of the month, in a United Nations building in Geneva, the representatives of 192 UN member states will await the arrival of the representative of a 193rd country. A lot is hanging in the balance. The last time they waited for this country, in January of this year, it refrained from sending a representative to appear. If Israel fails to appear this time either, one of the world's most important international mechanisms for the protection of human rights will be at risk.

The so-called Universal Periodic Review mechanism, the UPR, involves a worldwide process in which each of the United Nations' 193 member countries, on a rotating basis, delivers a report to all of the other members on the status of human rights within its borders. Israel's turn to report came in January, but the Israeli representatives failed to show up at the session. Israel therefore became the first country in the world that did not appear at a review session when it was on the agenda. Those in the corridors of the UN have been left guessing whether Israel will show up on the revised date, October 29.

In recent years, Israel has refused to cooperate with the international review process investigating allegations of human rights violations by Israel and breaches of international humanitarian law. Former Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman led this rejectionist approach, arguing that the mechanism and agencies such as the UN Human Rights Council have a particular bias against Israel. Paradoxically, however, by refusing to cooperate with the review procedure, Israel has actually chosen to do harm to the only process that is equally binding on all UN member states and that subject them to international scrutiny on the issue of human rights."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as