Skip to main content

Remembering what the Holocaust is

Perhaps under the radar in the media generally, there has been considerable debate in the last days relating to the memorialising of the Holocaust.   Starting with the Statement from the White House said to be commemorating Holocaust Day on 27 January, the Right has been having a field day distancing Jews from the Holocaust.    In this new "age" of pushing "facts" and "alternate facts" out there - looking at you Donald Trump and the awful team around you - the world needs to be on guard that the revisionists of history out there and those simply peddling lies doesn't take hold.    It is to be borne in mind that many people see Google as the source of all manner of information...and that is a worry when one reflects on the sort of web sites out there.

"We need to de-judaify the Holocaust apparently. That’s the latest from ‘alt-right’ poster boy Richard Spencer. Spencer, who by all accounts is the personification of a bacterial infection, feels that commemorating the Holocaust makes it really difficult for him to be a bigot.

In a post published in the Daily Stormer (named after Nazi publication Der Sturmer), Spencer griped about how Trump’s Holocaust Memorial Day statement was great because it prevented Jews from going on and on about their “meta-narrative of suffering” as a way of firming up their “peculiar position in American society”.

As a Jew, when I read that Holocaust Memorial Day statement I felt worried. An alternative fact inspired speech stamped with the official government seal denied the Jewish experience in 150 words. And let’s be clear, this isn’t just about the Jews.

Even if for a moment, we were to entertain the idea that the White House and Spencer’s issue with Holocaust remembrance is that it’s too “Jew focussed”, you would surely release a statement that names say, one of the other groups affected. Or any of the groups affected. Or perhaps, (ground breaking, I know), all of the groups that were affected. But that’s not what’s happening here.

The notion that Jewish connection to the Holocaust is an exaggerated idea made up by the ‘ruling elites’ (read: Yids) in order to reassert their power is an old anti-Semitic trope but it takes on fresh life with this new ‘world order’.

White supremacists have started to couch their ideas in pseudo academic assertions to make their stupid, dangerous points seem legitimate. What hipster Hitler is actually saying here is Jews have too much power and the Holocaust wasn’t a big deal.

It pains me that I feel it necessary to include this sentence: there was a fundamental, pinnacle part of Shoah that was about targeting, ostracising, ghettoising and gassing Jews, because they were Jews. That is undeniable. You don’t need to talk to survivors about that part; the Nazis were pretty open about that themselves, made a lot of speeches about it, even took some photos. And yet, I feel it’s important have it written here, because for the first time in my lifetime it seems that this objective historical fact is up for debate in what is becoming a more mainstream political discourse.

Denying Jewish connection to the Holocaust; bans on Muslim refugees and immigrants; it all comes from the same vile white supremacist thinking. This kind of rhetoric has real life, pernicious consequences for those it targets; it must be called out and ridiculed at every opportunity."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as

Climate change: Well-organised hoax?

There are still some - all too sadly people with a voice who are listened to - who assert that climate change is a hoax. Try telling that to the people of Colorado who recently experienced horrendous bushfires, or the people of Croatia suffering with endless days of temps of 40 degrees (and not much less than 30 at night time) some 8-10 degrees above the norm. Bill McKibben, take up the issue of whether climate change is a hoax, on The Daily Beast : Please don’t sweat the 2,132 new high temperature marks in June—remember, climate change is a hoax. The first to figure this out was Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, who in fact called it “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” apparently topping even the staged moon landing. But others have been catching on. Speaker of the House John Boehner pointed out that the idea that carbon dioxide is “harmful to the environment is almost comical.” The always cautious Mitt Romney scoffed at any damage too: “Scientists will fig